he beggar women? I have began to write the essay, but I am totally stuck for ideas. I would just like to get an idea of how other people would answer this question. It will help me a lot, don't worry you won't be doing my work for me, as this is purely just for ideas.
This is what I have wrote so far:
In `the beggar women`, `to his coy mistress` and `sonnet 130` we explore the ideas of attraction, love and deception. All the poems were written in the seventeenth century, this is evident in each poem.
In `to his...` we explore the idea of sexuality, virginity and `quaint honour` which is fostered from the society at the time. `The beggar ...` explores the fact that a woman would be disowned if she became pregnant before marriage. Finally `sonnet ...` mocks the idea of a fantasy love and expresses real love.
In ` to his ...` the man uses metaphors to flatter his ` mistress` in order to persuade her to have a physical relationship with him. He says if they had `but world enough and time` he would oblige to wait. This reveals this relationship is not made of the foundation on of love but lust. If he truly loved her he would wait till she was ready.
Similarly in `the beggar ...` the male figure, does not want a serious relationship, he just wants to have a physical relationship with her. He sees their relationship as a `game`. This reveals that this is not a serious relationship, when the male figure gets what he wants and goes and only returns till he wants more. Both men from `to his...` and `the beggar...` want the same thing, however in `to his ...` the relationship seems to be one of marriage, unlike `the beggar...` where the relationship is between a mistress and a loafer.
`Sonnet ...` has a different approach to love, Shakespeare’s relationship is not one of lust, it is true and deep love. Shakespeare does not use the typical love cliché’s. His wife’s eyes are `nothing like the sun;` Shakespeare knows his wife is far from perfect, yet this does not affect their love. Shakespeare experiences a greater love, a love with his wife’s personality and not with her appearance. Shakespeare’s love is greatly different from the `love` portrayed in `the beggar ...` and `to his coy...`, as he has not fallen in love with her appearance, he loves her for who she is.
This is what I have wrote so far:
In `the beggar women`, `to his coy mistress` and `sonnet 130` we explore the ideas of attraction, love and deception. All the poems were written in the seventeenth century, this is evident in each poem.
In `to his...` we explore the idea of sexuality, virginity and `quaint honour` which is fostered from the society at the time. `The beggar ...` explores the fact that a woman would be disowned if she became pregnant before marriage. Finally `sonnet ...` mocks the idea of a fantasy love and expresses real love.
In ` to his ...` the man uses metaphors to flatter his ` mistress` in order to persuade her to have a physical relationship with him. He says if they had `but world enough and time` he would oblige to wait. This reveals this relationship is not made of the foundation on of love but lust. If he truly loved her he would wait till she was ready.
Similarly in `the beggar ...` the male figure, does not want a serious relationship, he just wants to have a physical relationship with her. He sees their relationship as a `game`. This reveals that this is not a serious relationship, when the male figure gets what he wants and goes and only returns till he wants more. Both men from `to his...` and `the beggar...` want the same thing, however in `to his ...` the relationship seems to be one of marriage, unlike `the beggar...` where the relationship is between a mistress and a loafer.
`Sonnet ...` has a different approach to love, Shakespeare’s relationship is not one of lust, it is true and deep love. Shakespeare does not use the typical love cliché’s. His wife’s eyes are `nothing like the sun;` Shakespeare knows his wife is far from perfect, yet this does not affect their love. Shakespeare experiences a greater love, a love with his wife’s personality and not with her appearance. Shakespeare’s love is greatly different from the `love` portrayed in `the beggar ...` and `to his coy...`, as he has not fallen in love with her appearance, he loves her for who she is.