I think there are some of us out there who is on the brink of losing income and own homes. Having to pay $2000 would hurt the economy and those with weak incomes would be pushed over the edge.
But then, if this happens, basically all those homes that recently went into foreclosure and those about to would have their mortgages paid off in full, right? Or am I missing something? Then why not have those struggling homeowners keep their foreclosed homes and continue living in them and continue to pay the taxes on them. If and when their income situation improves, they should contribute to paying off the 700 Billion according to what they still have left on their mortgage. Of course, it would be necessary to weed out those who lost their homes to reckless spending decisions - sex, gambling and dope.
I think that $700 Billion would be better spent in creating jobs that those homeowners would take and they could continue on paying the mortgage as if nothing has happened. If everyone had to pay back $2000, what's to say they can't wait ten years to get it back with everybody paying $200 a year, or $16.67 a month, but would be slightly higher because of those who are too young to work and those too old or disabled to work, but would have thier part in paying this back, but can't. That $16.67 is already hidden many times over with the flucuating price of gas.