Dr. Phil of sh!t
New member
The endless debate about the first amendment rights of the Mosque builders now has the polar opposite(lets see the libs spin this one).
Chicago has passed an ordinance banning PRIVATE indoor firing ranges.
SOOOOO in Chicago you may own the property and be within your CONSTITUTIONAL rights under the second to keep and bear arms but yet they now want to ban just that by outlawing indoor firing ranges.
HMMMMMMMM wonder how those newly minter Constitution waving liberals will find a way out of supporting the second.
Pragueguy...Please cite the "public safety issue"
laws already are on the books about transportation and securing weapons.
How is an approved inspected indoor range a public safety issue???
Master B...the second amendment give the right to "keep and bear without infringement" how could denying a private property owner the right to have an indoor range be ANY different than having a Mosque both are merely "rooms" built for different purposes
Or is "the gun" you have the problem with
Ahhh the "militia" card played as usuall by those who do not understand punctuation in the document nor do they take heed of the current SCOTUS ruling of it meaning an individual right or the endless writings on the subject and intent by the founders and the FACT that a MILITIA is by definition the POPULATION so by right of birth I am in the militia.
Nano nano ....so guns need to be regulated but guys who fly planes into buildings don't got it.
MasterB I am speaking only to the outright "cherry picking" by the left as to what amendment they will support.
Nano nao notice those things called commas go google the definition and use of them in the english language.
Chicago has passed an ordinance banning PRIVATE indoor firing ranges.
SOOOOO in Chicago you may own the property and be within your CONSTITUTIONAL rights under the second to keep and bear arms but yet they now want to ban just that by outlawing indoor firing ranges.
HMMMMMMMM wonder how those newly minter Constitution waving liberals will find a way out of supporting the second.
Pragueguy...Please cite the "public safety issue"
laws already are on the books about transportation and securing weapons.
How is an approved inspected indoor range a public safety issue???
Master B...the second amendment give the right to "keep and bear without infringement" how could denying a private property owner the right to have an indoor range be ANY different than having a Mosque both are merely "rooms" built for different purposes
Or is "the gun" you have the problem with
Ahhh the "militia" card played as usuall by those who do not understand punctuation in the document nor do they take heed of the current SCOTUS ruling of it meaning an individual right or the endless writings on the subject and intent by the founders and the FACT that a MILITIA is by definition the POPULATION so by right of birth I am in the militia.
Nano nano ....so guns need to be regulated but guys who fly planes into buildings don't got it.
MasterB I am speaking only to the outright "cherry picking" by the left as to what amendment they will support.
Nano nao notice those things called commas go google the definition and use of them in the english language.