Wild Dreamer
New member
I need a Issue(the fist paragraph), I need the arguments (for and against). Can you please try to give good, detailed points. THANKYOU!
HELP - Debate - TV commercials shouldn't be compulsory?
- Thread starter Wild Dreamer
- Start date
MAIN ARGUMENT : WE SHOULD GET PAID FOR IT. AFFERMATIVE
So lets think about this about.
how much does the media earn in commercials? Alot. So they are earing all this money, to waste our valuble time. Should they choose to promote, that is inform us of products, then it is their responsbility. Simply expecting or rather, forcing people to be interuppted for the medias own personal growth, that they get from wasting our time, is not justly.
Why isnt it justly?
It is OUR time. And with our time, we do not wish to waste. Should they choosse to waste our time with conpulsory adds , then we should be paid for this. No one works for free, and no one wants their time wasted for free - just so the media can get richer and richer.
MAIN LINE : consumers( we pay for TV - note * the other team can argue that commercials pay for the shows we watch on TV , just mention here that the topic does involove PAY TV )
so, consumers should not be forced into unltimatly brain washing material taht wastes their time, for free, and thus all commercials should not be compolsory.
Now, the other team will say, some peopl liked to be inform. Cut in with your arrgument and say - yes, some people may like to be informed of new products and shows, but this is a case of the WHOLE MAJORTY suffery for the MINORITY. Should one person wish to view commercials, they can do that in THEIR OWN TIME, or perhaps a new channel should be created for those who wish to view commercials.
NEGATIVE ( SHOULD BE )
1. commercials pay for tv shows on NORMAL TV
2. some govenments advertise like smoking for example.
3. its a good methood of informing the whole public
4. it allows business growth, as promotiion of sales means more economy.
5. its a chance to go bathroom ect between shows and things
6. it gives aa chance for the TV broadcasters to set up next shows ( TV broadcasters need some time and a break too! )
7. Most of them only last 1 min. doesnt really have a neg. effect.
8. a moment for a general discussion by family or friends.
Most of the aff. aguments will be the oppposite or rebuttles to the NEG argument anyways.
hope ii helped!
So lets think about this about.
how much does the media earn in commercials? Alot. So they are earing all this money, to waste our valuble time. Should they choose to promote, that is inform us of products, then it is their responsbility. Simply expecting or rather, forcing people to be interuppted for the medias own personal growth, that they get from wasting our time, is not justly.
Why isnt it justly?
It is OUR time. And with our time, we do not wish to waste. Should they choosse to waste our time with conpulsory adds , then we should be paid for this. No one works for free, and no one wants their time wasted for free - just so the media can get richer and richer.
MAIN LINE : consumers( we pay for TV - note * the other team can argue that commercials pay for the shows we watch on TV , just mention here that the topic does involove PAY TV )
so, consumers should not be forced into unltimatly brain washing material taht wastes their time, for free, and thus all commercials should not be compolsory.
Now, the other team will say, some peopl liked to be inform. Cut in with your arrgument and say - yes, some people may like to be informed of new products and shows, but this is a case of the WHOLE MAJORTY suffery for the MINORITY. Should one person wish to view commercials, they can do that in THEIR OWN TIME, or perhaps a new channel should be created for those who wish to view commercials.
NEGATIVE ( SHOULD BE )
1. commercials pay for tv shows on NORMAL TV
2. some govenments advertise like smoking for example.
3. its a good methood of informing the whole public
4. it allows business growth, as promotiion of sales means more economy.
5. its a chance to go bathroom ect between shows and things
6. it gives aa chance for the TV broadcasters to set up next shows ( TV broadcasters need some time and a break too! )
7. Most of them only last 1 min. doesnt really have a neg. effect.
8. a moment for a general discussion by family or friends.
Most of the aff. aguments will be the oppposite or rebuttles to the NEG argument anyways.
hope ii helped!
K
Keer
Guest
For people who does not watch television shows,it wouldn't be much a use because they won't receive the message or the product you're advertising.
It is a waste of money if the advertisement isn't convincing enough for the viewers.You'll have to waste manpower as well to think of a super convincing idea for the advertisement to prevent waste of finance.
It is a waste of money if the advertisement isn't convincing enough for the viewers.You'll have to waste manpower as well to think of a super convincing idea for the advertisement to prevent waste of finance.