Hebrews 8:7-10 (KJV)
For if that first [covenant] had been faultless, then should no place have been sought for the second. For finding fault with them, he saith, Behold, the days come, saith the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah: Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day when I took them by the hand to lead them out of the land of Egypt; because they continued not in my covenant, and I regarded them not, saith the Lord. For this [is] the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, saith the Lord; I will put my laws into their mind, and write them in their hearts: and I will be to them a God, and they shall be to me a people:
So a new covenant is a "better covenant" with "better promises",
and such is in a "better testament" which also has "better hope"
(love your enemies is better for us than hate your enemy for them)
but it's still of plural (them/us) God: Majesty in the (plural) heavens,
and still has two houses: one still being lawed, one being graced;
which is still division, not peace, and still partiality, not perfection.
Peace (perfection) is having no enemies, neither to hate nor to love.
Not to mention division still has a mediator, but in Galatians 3:20 the
bewitched are told a mediator (Jesus) is not of one, but God is one.
So non plural God is above both of 2 houses ... higher
House of Israel <-- and --> House of Judah ... on high
(Seat of Moses <-- and --> Seat of Jesus ... still division)
For Christ sitteth "above": higher than the plural heavens,
where Jesus sat "down": R of plural L/R heavens on high.
So Christ rightly divides the word of truth under/above: friends,
But Jesus wrongly divided the word of truth left/right: enemies.
So if I go over to the other house, to the house of Judah,
would it end the division, partiality, and sides war on high,
or do I have to leave both houses for true peace is above?
For if that first [covenant] had been faultless, then should no place have been sought for the second. For finding fault with them, he saith, Behold, the days come, saith the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah: Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day when I took them by the hand to lead them out of the land of Egypt; because they continued not in my covenant, and I regarded them not, saith the Lord. For this [is] the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, saith the Lord; I will put my laws into their mind, and write them in their hearts: and I will be to them a God, and they shall be to me a people:
So a new covenant is a "better covenant" with "better promises",
and such is in a "better testament" which also has "better hope"
(love your enemies is better for us than hate your enemy for them)
but it's still of plural (them/us) God: Majesty in the (plural) heavens,
and still has two houses: one still being lawed, one being graced;
which is still division, not peace, and still partiality, not perfection.
Peace (perfection) is having no enemies, neither to hate nor to love.
Not to mention division still has a mediator, but in Galatians 3:20 the
bewitched are told a mediator (Jesus) is not of one, but God is one.
So non plural God is above both of 2 houses ... higher
House of Israel <-- and --> House of Judah ... on high
(Seat of Moses <-- and --> Seat of Jesus ... still division)
For Christ sitteth "above": higher than the plural heavens,
where Jesus sat "down": R of plural L/R heavens on high.
So Christ rightly divides the word of truth under/above: friends,
But Jesus wrongly divided the word of truth left/right: enemies.
So if I go over to the other house, to the house of Judah,
would it end the division, partiality, and sides war on high,
or do I have to leave both houses for true peace is above?