HD photography--is it true HD?

  • Thread starter Thread starter BodhiU
  • Start date Start date
B

BodhiU

Guest
I thought I'd give the new HD photography craze a try, purchasing a Kodak Easyshare Z1015 (a decent low end camera). I see some improvement over my past cameras but nothing like I expected. Is this camera really HD? I'm shooting at 10 MP and at the highest quality range.

I consider myself an advanced amateur photographer and shot mostly in manual mode.
 
What is HD photography?

Please clarify the term, because you may mean several different things.

HD abbreviation that I am familiar with pertains to video - TV sets and video camcorders. It stands for High definition, and means that it is capable of capturing/displaying more than standard (SD) TV's 720x480 image (480i standard)

If that's what you ask for - yes Z1015 can record video at 720p, which is not highest HD standard (which is 1080p), but quite decent for a video (resolution of 1280x720). Though using a still image camera for video recording is quite pathetic in my opinion.

If you're asking about HDR - High Dynamic Range photography, yes you can do it, but it does not do this automatically, nor I would call this camera a great choice for HDR photography. HDR means you get the scene with a wider range of separation between shadows and highlights, and get everything in a shot exposed correctly. No blowouts or falloffs. Not sure if it supports bracketing, but if it does, makes it easier. If not a lot harder as it needs a very steady tripod, so that you can take a few shots without moving the camera a notch, while changing settings in between. Then you need special software to process HDR images. You can, sometimes get a sort of HDR from a single RAW frame, but that does not always work as well.

If you're asking about something else - you need to tell us more of what you ask. But in all honesty, I wouldn't hold a Kodak p&s camera to a task of producing far superior images. If you are an advanced amateur and shoot manual (and understand what you're doing in a process, not just relying on camera meter or experimenting to set your manual settings blindly, or willing to learn it) - you really need an SLR camera to move forward. Getting a better p&s will not get you advanced too far.

LEM.
 
HD has always referred to video.

Perhaps the confusion is that many P&S cameras include a low quality video feature (when compared to video cameras) and at a certain resolution (1280 x 720 -- less than one MP) and refer to that video as HD.

True HD would be video used to later be converted to 35 mm theatrical film releases. Two such cameras are the Red One and Sony Cine-Alta.

http://www.red.com/

http://pro.sony.com/bbsc/ssr/cat-broadcastcameras/cat-cinealta/

These two video cameras are true HD video cameras.

P&S as you have discovered for the most part do not allow manual control of the camera's and have tiny sensors when compared to a DSLR ... like 15 times smaller.

It may be you are expecting the same quality from your P&S camera with a 10 mp sensor that would be found when using a 10 mp DSLR ... that will never happen. It is the size of the sensor that counts, not the number of pixels that are squeezed into the sensors real estate.
 
Back
Top