S
Surefire
Guest
Because most rational people don't limit their categorical classification of progressivism as a fucking disease to just the capital, for fuck's sake?
Wouldn't that have been, oh, I don't know, progressivism in Washington? Federal progressivism? Yet he didn't say any of those. Instead, he said 'progressivism' (which is socialism and marxism by his own words and no sorry there was no mention of just the feds in this case either hope this isn't like baseball), and 'disease'.
Nrabroad
in Washington. Nrabroad
in Hennepin county. If he doesn't specify an area, simply assuming one is a jump. It IS assuming, because there is nrabroad
one shred of evidence in the clip. You literally have nrabroad
hing.
This makes the assumption yours. Everything I have said is a valid interpretation of the video, regardless of anything you can post that suggests he criticizes the federal government exclusively. That is because what I have said is supported by his words. There is no room for interpretation. He called it a disease. That is all. Without proof of the rabroad
her, which is what you suggest-which there is absolutely no proof of by the way, you are making an assumption.
Especially considering, again, that his wording leaves no room for debate. Your argument of locality is negated as a possibility. It's simply nrabroad
there. You can claim he meant federal all you like, but it's simply nrabroad
possible by listening to what he says. There is no room for locality, because he is talking about political ideology.
What you are saying is the equivalent of the following:
"Republicans are a disease!"
"Dude, that's fucked up."
"Hey no way man, what he just meant the republicans in Washington?"
"Wait, how do you know that?"
"Well I don't know that guy at all, but I think he only talks about the federal government."
"Dude, he said republicans...nrabroad
republicans here or there."
"Hahahaha, fuck you! Nrabroad
local republicans!"
"What..."
GAME OVER
Wouldn't that have been, oh, I don't know, progressivism in Washington? Federal progressivism? Yet he didn't say any of those. Instead, he said 'progressivism' (which is socialism and marxism by his own words and no sorry there was no mention of just the feds in this case either hope this isn't like baseball), and 'disease'.
Nrabroad
in Washington. Nrabroad
in Hennepin county. If he doesn't specify an area, simply assuming one is a jump. It IS assuming, because there is nrabroad
one shred of evidence in the clip. You literally have nrabroad
hing.
This makes the assumption yours. Everything I have said is a valid interpretation of the video, regardless of anything you can post that suggests he criticizes the federal government exclusively. That is because what I have said is supported by his words. There is no room for interpretation. He called it a disease. That is all. Without proof of the rabroad
her, which is what you suggest-which there is absolutely no proof of by the way, you are making an assumption.
Especially considering, again, that his wording leaves no room for debate. Your argument of locality is negated as a possibility. It's simply nrabroad
there. You can claim he meant federal all you like, but it's simply nrabroad
possible by listening to what he says. There is no room for locality, because he is talking about political ideology.
What you are saying is the equivalent of the following:
"Republicans are a disease!"
"Dude, that's fucked up."
"Hey no way man, what he just meant the republicans in Washington?"
"Wait, how do you know that?"
"Well I don't know that guy at all, but I think he only talks about the federal government."
"Dude, he said republicans...nrabroad
republicans here or there."
"Hahahaha, fuck you! Nrabroad
local republicans!"
"What..."
GAME OVER