relevant or logical? Brilliant people of science, who have spent their entire lives studying the mysteries of our universe, have put together pieces of a puzzle that may indeed never be complete, but they have cast an enormous light on the origins of our universe, the formation and the history of our planets, and how the earth became ripe for all different forms of life. Humans have literally reached out and touched the stars, and they have cast an enormous shadow on the human notion of a God of any "faith". Is it simply the yearning for a life after death that keeps certain religious myths alive? Please explain to me how an intelligent, logical, and common sensical human being, upon studying and knowing all that we have learned, and how far we have come, can simply reject the mountainous volumes of scientific evidence regarding the time-proven facts of our very beginnings by having the audacity to even ponder the fantasies and fallacies an un-proven "God"?
Given all we know about the origin of the universe, science, and human history, is God
- Thread starter Rebooted
- Start date