You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Forbes Fictional 15 List 2011
- Thread starter curly girl <3
- Start date
Finally, Scrooge is #1! I'm not quite sure why he kept getting lower ranks, doesn't Forbes know that he's worth 'one multiplujillion, nine obsquatumatillion, six hundred twenty-three dollars and sixty-two cents'?
After all, being the richest person in the world is what makes up the majority of Scrooge's character. And if that Twilight character kept being picked as #1, I'd judge this list of picking popularity over numbers.
After all, being the richest person in the world is what makes up the majority of Scrooge's character. And if that Twilight character kept being picked as #1, I'd judge this list of picking popularity over numbers.
life sucks:/
New member
Scrooge was #1 last year; I guess you don't remember.
It's definitely a popularity contest if Arthur Bach can get on; I haven't seen him in the list at any other time than the exact time a remake of his movie came out.
Also: Why so few women?
http://blogs.forbes.com/michaelnoer/2011/03/10/why-so-few-women-on-the-forbes-fictional-15/
It's definitely a popularity contest if Arthur Bach can get on; I haven't seen him in the list at any other time than the exact time a remake of his movie came out.
Also: Why so few women?
http://blogs.forbes.com/michaelnoer/2011/03/10/why-so-few-women-on-the-forbes-fictional-15/
No, the Cullen chap was clearly #1 last year. I remember reading it in the Globe And Mail and it's proven here too. I still don't know where they get this measly 'billion' business for Scrooge, though. Yes, I'm over-obsessed.
http://www.forbes.com/2010/04/13/richest-fictional-characters-opinions-wealth.html
http://www.forbes.com/2010/04/13/richest-fictional-characters-opinions-wealth.html
Brahamfam24
New member
Yes, for once I agree with #1 on the list... to borrow the Hulk's catchphrase, "Scrooge richest one there is." ;-)
Past Scrooge, I'd have placed the Rich family (not Richie himself---it's his parents' wealth he's using; his $100,000 a week allowance = $5.2 million a year... Miley Cyrus probably made more than that from Hanna Montana ;-) ) a notch below whatever McDuck's worth.
Ignoring the bizarre or limited-imagination-choices on the list (the *remake* of Arthur without a word about Dudley Moore?!), I'd have also placed Hiram Lodge, Veronica's father from "Archie" comics, on the list, being a billionaire (in modern books)...
Past Scrooge, I'd have placed the Rich family (not Richie himself---it's his parents' wealth he's using; his $100,000 a week allowance = $5.2 million a year... Miley Cyrus probably made more than that from Hanna Montana ;-) ) a notch below whatever McDuck's worth.
Ignoring the bizarre or limited-imagination-choices on the list (the *remake* of Arthur without a word about Dudley Moore?!), I'd have also placed Hiram Lodge, Veronica's father from "Archie" comics, on the list, being a billionaire (in modern books)...
SeXy SpRiNkLeZ!
New member
Yes, I believe in one of Carl Barks' stories Scrooge's wealth is said to be... "One multiplujillion, nine obsquatumatillion, six hundred twenty-three dollars and sixty-two cents"
!
!