A common problem that people come up against when debating Noah's Ark is the lack of space for every species of animal on earth: Answers in Genesis attempts to solve this problem:
"How many animals were on Noah’s Ark? If created kinds really are families, as few as 2,000 individual animals might have been on the Ark.10 There were probably a bit more than that since the clean animals came in by sevens. Whatever the exact number, though, there would have been plenty of room to house these and their food, plus Noah and his family. Caring for these animals for a year would have been difficult but not impossible. God’s wisdom ensured that basic kinds of animals would survive the Flood by allowing individual species to change."
What is your counterargument? Remember that we're both on the same team, it's just that I'm a little braindead right now, I suppose.
Stop running around the question. You know that Christians won't except a general disproving without a specific one first. Is actually answering the question that hard?
Insulting Christians won't convince them. You need to fight fire with fire (or false reasoning with true reasoning).
"How many animals were on Noah’s Ark? If created kinds really are families, as few as 2,000 individual animals might have been on the Ark.10 There were probably a bit more than that since the clean animals came in by sevens. Whatever the exact number, though, there would have been plenty of room to house these and their food, plus Noah and his family. Caring for these animals for a year would have been difficult but not impossible. God’s wisdom ensured that basic kinds of animals would survive the Flood by allowing individual species to change."
What is your counterargument? Remember that we're both on the same team, it's just that I'm a little braindead right now, I suppose.
Stop running around the question. You know that Christians won't except a general disproving without a specific one first. Is actually answering the question that hard?
Insulting Christians won't convince them. You need to fight fire with fire (or false reasoning with true reasoning).