britotarcisio
New member
In principle, few people admit they are conservative. Conservative in the sense of not accepting the established can be changed, rewritten, or reconsidered, whatever it is: a political position, religious or scientific. Conservatives rely statistical effect.
Well. Science is so. Any new idea that contradicts the established, is ignored. Now, a consideration that science does not usually take into account: your pieces are of various partial theory. Each of these partial theories describes and provides a specific and limited class of observations, disregarding the effects of other quantities, or representing them by simple sets of numbers. It is possible that this approach is entirely wrong. If everything in the universe depends on everything else in a fundamental way, it might be impossible to get closer to a solution through an investigation of isolated part of the problem.
Unlike "The reality is changing, and we with it." The rules and laws as Einstein wanted, comes after decades in this diagram to solve the greatest puzzle of modern physics - made by a Brazilian who analyzed the problems existing on Earth and for new emerging - I propose that all fantastically blind to certain truths that are more painful , for example, understand the way it has been shown the truth of the biogenesis (...) and the inevitability of abiogenesis, the new fact: if life arises from pre-existing life, it is obvious the infinity of life on Earth where all species, including man, is certainly ancestral origin, and the continuity of life (the future) results in an arrival at last of prehistory, and that just about the gift of Our History.
Circle that repeats the genetics of life on earth - be they human, animal or plant. This is all part of the cycle of chemical, which is linked to the environment: flora, fauna and micro-organisms which are the geological factors of balance, atmospheric, meteorological and biological, materials and energies of the earth's ecosystem - if they can verify this empirically revered with proof of this diagram: G (+)> <((-) Earth (+))> <(-) Interstellar system, as well as with this math: a neutral force between two opposite forces at different temperatures, has different kinetic energies, which can meet the infinitely macro universe finite in size and infinite in its time.
Do you agree? Or prefer to rely on several pieces of partial theory?
Well. Science is so. Any new idea that contradicts the established, is ignored. Now, a consideration that science does not usually take into account: your pieces are of various partial theory. Each of these partial theories describes and provides a specific and limited class of observations, disregarding the effects of other quantities, or representing them by simple sets of numbers. It is possible that this approach is entirely wrong. If everything in the universe depends on everything else in a fundamental way, it might be impossible to get closer to a solution through an investigation of isolated part of the problem.
Unlike "The reality is changing, and we with it." The rules and laws as Einstein wanted, comes after decades in this diagram to solve the greatest puzzle of modern physics - made by a Brazilian who analyzed the problems existing on Earth and for new emerging - I propose that all fantastically blind to certain truths that are more painful , for example, understand the way it has been shown the truth of the biogenesis (...) and the inevitability of abiogenesis, the new fact: if life arises from pre-existing life, it is obvious the infinity of life on Earth where all species, including man, is certainly ancestral origin, and the continuity of life (the future) results in an arrival at last of prehistory, and that just about the gift of Our History.
Circle that repeats the genetics of life on earth - be they human, animal or plant. This is all part of the cycle of chemical, which is linked to the environment: flora, fauna and micro-organisms which are the geological factors of balance, atmospheric, meteorological and biological, materials and energies of the earth's ecosystem - if they can verify this empirically revered with proof of this diagram: G (+)> <((-) Earth (+))> <(-) Interstellar system, as well as with this math: a neutral force between two opposite forces at different temperatures, has different kinetic energies, which can meet the infinitely macro universe finite in size and infinite in its time.
Do you agree? Or prefer to rely on several pieces of partial theory?