C
chris p
Guest
okay,
yahoo answers--- science and mathematics--biology
is by definition a scientific forum; yet people still insist on writing creationist stuff in answer to serious questions. fair play people are entitled to beliefs, but belief is theology not science. science is based around evidence, theology is based on a more spiritual plane. there is pretty darn conclusive proof that evolution occured, such as fossil records and homologous stuctures, yet god hasnt appeared in 2000 years. which is more likely?
and if god made man in his own image, how come all men look different. they 'should' all look like eachother, and god for that reason. doesnt that slightly ruin the point?
final rant point here, how come if man was first, how come he is almost last in the fossil record?
can we keep it 'science' here please, unless you have conclusive evidence?
yahoo answers--- science and mathematics--biology
is by definition a scientific forum; yet people still insist on writing creationist stuff in answer to serious questions. fair play people are entitled to beliefs, but belief is theology not science. science is based around evidence, theology is based on a more spiritual plane. there is pretty darn conclusive proof that evolution occured, such as fossil records and homologous stuctures, yet god hasnt appeared in 2000 years. which is more likely?
and if god made man in his own image, how come all men look different. they 'should' all look like eachother, and god for that reason. doesnt that slightly ruin the point?
final rant point here, how come if man was first, how come he is almost last in the fossil record?
can we keep it 'science' here please, unless you have conclusive evidence?