E-mule Or Kmd Or Bit

salam4ever

New member
e-mule suxs even bitTorrent that i hate's better than e-mule

:lol: :lol:

for real when your downloads done it still needs 2 download more mf source
bitTorrent's better than kmd and e-mule !

cuz when you leav bitT it takes about 6 hurs 2 download a 3 gb game

v1 = emules better
v2 = bittorrent (mods)
v3 =ckmd or kmd

-------------------
im the only person who hates bittorrent , but i vote for it!
 
1. bt
2. emule
3. klite


emule if so fucking slow
i get 300kb/s on bt all the time. emule takes like 2 days just to get out of the queue line, and the speed goes at like 2kb/s
 
man, bt never goes above 4 kb/s for me! since i severely dislike e-mule, i'll go with k-lite cuz i get decent speeds on there for most stuff i download. B)
 
for now i'm using
- Burst! (bittorent)
- Overnet (ed2k)

With eMule i'm staying in quesville :(
With k-lite to many corrupted/fake files on the network :angry:
Bittorent is usefull for me with files bigger than 700MB :D
 
1) Overnet Lite (but eMule might be better for LowId people)
2) Soulseek (for music)
3) K-Lite for some small stuff (beware of fakes/corruption)
I've never used BT.
 
With 6-8 downloads I average an 50-55kB/s download speed with emule on my 512/256kbps line. Emule is the choice of the patient user who wants a good quality file and don't need it in 30 minutes. If properly configured you get pretty good speeds...

Just my two cents...
 
Originally posted by birk@12 April 2004 - 06:30
With 6-8 downloads I average an 50-55kB/s download speed with emule on my 512/256kbps line. Emule is the choice of the patient user who wants a good quality file and don't need it in 30 minutes. If properly configured you get pretty good speeds...

Just my two cents...
Same as bittorrent.... the problem is that with bittorrent you get quality + speed (the 30 minutes you talk about ;))
 
Back
Top