Does the media choose our leaders, via spin and bias?

slappyjk

New member
sHrillery was a "witches slipper" into the WH, when the media discovered Obama could speak on camera much better than sHrillery, she lacks the people skills of her grifter "husband in name only".

The media rallied around Obama, who was equally vulnerable to questions about inexperience to lead, oh, like Palin was crucified, while Obama is equally unqualified, was spared. HHhhmmmm, just a coincidence?

How about civil rights. I have polled and asked black people if they chose Jackson and Sharpton to represent them in civil rights. Their response was an overwhelming, "hell no". Black people are offended when you assume they chose race baiters to lead civil rights- they didn't choose those two opportunists, who incite racial hatred and conflict.

Then who chose Jackson and Sharpton? Liberals (those who are honest) will say it was not liberals, liberals say they support Dr King's message, not Jessie's. Liberals will deny responsibility for these false leaders and say it wasn't them.

So, who chose Jackson and Sharpton to be the leaders for civil rights?
Who turns the camera onto them and gives them front page attention whenever there is a white on black racial incident?

Does the media choose our leaders, indirectly via propaganda, slander, spin and disparagement?
 
Back
Top