Shouldn't we be using environmentally sound practices either way? Do we really need to PROVE that fossil fuels are bad for the only planet we have in order to stop using them?
Doesn't all this debate just distract us from the fact that no matter who is in office, our government is doing jack diddly squat to protect the environment?
Considering that I've posted this question as non-partisan as possible, I am really laughing at some of the responses.
Ok so, whatever its called, whatever its actually doing, whatever the problem is, why do we need to debate over it it if we know for sure that it's harmful to the earth?
Doesn't all this debate just distract us from the fact that no matter who is in office, our government is doing jack diddly squat to protect the environment?
Considering that I've posted this question as non-partisan as possible, I am really laughing at some of the responses.
Ok so, whatever its called, whatever its actually doing, whatever the problem is, why do we need to debate over it it if we know for sure that it's harmful to the earth?