Who does that unless? you have a vested interest in Iran/Iraq? Usually spies act like spies--travel where spies travel and hide and sneak around.
So how can anyone for certain claim these "supposed'hikers" hiking on a terrorist border are innocent of the crimes they are charged just because it is a charge being levied by Iraq?
Isn't it possible they were doing EXACTLY what the Iraq claim? And if they are innocent--why hike in a terrorists country--even by accident? They look guilty--and
in my opinion--I believe they were spying--and are not innocent as they claim.
What say you?
So how can anyone for certain claim these "supposed'hikers" hiking on a terrorist border are innocent of the crimes they are charged just because it is a charge being levied by Iraq?
Isn't it possible they were doing EXACTLY what the Iraq claim? And if they are innocent--why hike in a terrorists country--even by accident? They look guilty--and
in my opinion--I believe they were spying--and are not innocent as they claim.
What say you?