Do you think that unqualified people can accurately debate evolution vs creationism?

  • Thread starter Thread starter T C
  • Start date Start date
T

T C

Guest
I mean scientists and theologians are the experts, but I see creationists on here making wild claims about evolution that they know nothing about or they copied off the young earthers website. The scientific consensus is that evolution is real so how are the deniers of this any different from say someone who says that a rocket cant fly, that scientists theorys about its flight are not true and that its really god doing it? Does anyone agree with me here?
Conversely matters of faith should be left to those qualified, Theologians, preists, the pope. (By the way the pope recently said evolution was a fact but which did not contradict god)
An atheist would not be qualified to judge on subjective matters such as faith in miracles, eg substantiation of the wine during communion.
Well what does everyone think, and please no 'god did its' 'religion is stupid' or evolution is stupid'. And if anyone asks 'if evolution made us then how come there still monkeys?' or talks of exploding dots i will lmao
 
My general opinion is that people must talk about what they know. Unfortunately, a lot of people think that they have the right to talk on everything. It is true but not convenient so my opinion is that only the experts with a specific specialization about this topic must talk about it. My only suggestion for them is to talk in the easier way possible so all can understand. Moreover, I think that the Bible is not a scientific text and newer it was be a scientific text! It want be a guide of our soul and conscience, territories where Science is out.
 
Back
Top