Do you blindly follow the media and politicians on "global warming"?

  • Thread starter Thread starter LadySmith
  • Start date Start date
L

LadySmith

Guest
There is no evidence to prove the CO2 emissions are to blame for the slight rise in the global temps, the inconvenient truth (for Al Gore) is, the evidence points the other way.
In addition, something that the media almost never addresses are the holes in the theory that C02 has been the driving force in global warming.
Alarmists fail to adequately explain why temperatures
began warming at the end of the Little Ice Age in about 1850, long before man-made CO2 emissions could have impacted the climate.
Then about 1940, just as man-made CO2 emissions rose sharply, the
temperatures began a decline that lasted until the 1970’s, prompting the media and many scientists to fear a coming ice age.
Temperatures got colder after C02 emissions exploded. If C02 is the driving force of global climate change, why do so many in the media ignore the many skeptical scientists who cite these rather obvious inconvenient truths?
 
Do you blindly follow the media and politicians on "global warming"?
No but I saw a video on you tube where a bunch of kids were blindly following Obama.
I am going to post the link to the video until everyone in America and the world has seen it.
 
No. Just the fact that explanations and facts are seldom published in the media is cause for suspicion. Facts like the effect of water vapor, or that the little ice age ended just before temperature records started. Even the coming ice age scare of the 70s is not mentioned, except that whenever they talk about ice extents, ice extent is always compared to the 70s.

You can compare the effect of CO2 to water vapor yourself, by observing that clear nights cool off rapidly. Cloudy or humid nights don't. That's why deserts cool off rapidly at night. Desert air is dry because of convection. Convection is how most heat reaches the upper atmosphere, where it radiates into space freely, and doesn't radiate downward because of the greenhouse effect. If it weren't for the fact that most cities are near water (humidity sources) the AGW theory would have no chance.

Water holds a lot of heat (specific heat). It rises well because it's 18/28ths as heavy as the atmosphere (mole wt H2). It condenses in the bitter cold of the upper atmosphere, releasing the heat. Of course water vapor is ~90% of the greenhouse effect, but it just rises. More heat, more convection transferring heat upward.


"Greenhouse" is a bad analogy, because a greenhouse without a roof holds no heat.

There is so many things wrong with this scam, its hard to stop.
 
O.K. so you are married to a Mobil Oil Baron right! Ya, I knew it.
I do not know which scientist you are referring to, but post them here and we will then help them learn the truth also!
Global warming is real, Co 2 emissions, loss of Ozone protective layer.
The Horticultural industry is preparing a new map for planting zones in the U.S.
My grandchildren could give you lessons on Global Warming
 
Back
Top