What do I mean?
Here's what I mean.
A. (Men) In society I notice we put down men who don't enough p***y as if they're less masculine. But logically speaking does that make sense? If you had two guys.
Guy 1. knows how to hunt (with spear, bow and arrow, knife), fish, farm, fight and basically take care of himself. But has only had three women in his lifetime.
Guy 2. Doesn't know how to do any of these things. But has had relations with 30 women in his life time. Is Guy2 necessarily more of a man simply because he got more a** then Guy1?
B. (Women) Also we put down women who are not superficially pretty based on media standards as not being feminine enough.
Girl 1. Knows how to wash dishes, clean up a house, make deep passionate love to her man, take care of her children, prepare some of the best food etc. But she doesn't wear expensive dresses, or make up or jewelry.
Girl 2. Doesn't understand any of these womanly type duties. But looks sexy as hell on a regular basis. With the newest outfit, freshest nails and most crisp hair/makeup. Is she necessarily more feminine than the other woman?
It's just like Sports or shopping. They seem to be applied to masculine and feminine but are they really?
Are we seriously projecting FALSE ideals onto what is feminine and what is masculine?
Oh and btw there definitely are REAL, NATURAL and LOGICAL traits of masculinity and femininity that exist within human beings. I'm asking if we're adding to these natural traits, traits that have nothing or very little to do with manhood or womanhood.
These are the videos that made think about this.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XxreF7Pr3z8&feature=mfu_in_order&list=UL
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HS8qqNnR3aM
Lol. Check the comments. You'll see what I mean.
Here's what I mean.
A. (Men) In society I notice we put down men who don't enough p***y as if they're less masculine. But logically speaking does that make sense? If you had two guys.
Guy 1. knows how to hunt (with spear, bow and arrow, knife), fish, farm, fight and basically take care of himself. But has only had three women in his lifetime.
Guy 2. Doesn't know how to do any of these things. But has had relations with 30 women in his life time. Is Guy2 necessarily more of a man simply because he got more a** then Guy1?
B. (Women) Also we put down women who are not superficially pretty based on media standards as not being feminine enough.
Girl 1. Knows how to wash dishes, clean up a house, make deep passionate love to her man, take care of her children, prepare some of the best food etc. But she doesn't wear expensive dresses, or make up or jewelry.
Girl 2. Doesn't understand any of these womanly type duties. But looks sexy as hell on a regular basis. With the newest outfit, freshest nails and most crisp hair/makeup. Is she necessarily more feminine than the other woman?
It's just like Sports or shopping. They seem to be applied to masculine and feminine but are they really?
Are we seriously projecting FALSE ideals onto what is feminine and what is masculine?
Oh and btw there definitely are REAL, NATURAL and LOGICAL traits of masculinity and femininity that exist within human beings. I'm asking if we're adding to these natural traits, traits that have nothing or very little to do with manhood or womanhood.
These are the videos that made think about this.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XxreF7Pr3z8&feature=mfu_in_order&list=UL
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HS8qqNnR3aM
Lol. Check the comments. You'll see what I mean.