Z
ziggystarsdust08
Guest
I've heard from alot of people, especially nurses it seems, that children have stunted mental growth due to the mercury in vaccines. What i don't understand is where they get this information, i have yet to run across a person who has actual research backing their claim, and why, if what they claim is true, is research actually claiming that vacinnes are not linked w/ autism. Also, why wouldn't more people be metally stunted if all our vaccines as a child were so dangerous?
I feel that people who are afflicted by a mentally stunted child tend to point fingers at the medicine b/c its easy, removes the blaim from themselves(and please don't think i'm saying they are wrong, obviously in some cases mercury poisoning is probably the more likely cause) but when dealing w/ these cases doesn't it make more sense to blaim the more probably cause, which is probably some other enviromental factor. Like what the mother was eating or drinking during pregnancy, or even after, or even what the parents let the kid be exposed to at school or in the foods that they digest?
thanks for all this info. Its quite suprising actually, I guess I had too much faith in the system. Alot of the articles I'm reading still contradict one another, but they all agree that mercury is of course dangerous, but they argue on how much is dangerous. Why not just remove them completely! lol, well thanks for everyones responses, clears things up. Also read that the reason why not everyone is effected is b/c the mercury only effects those babies that have a weakened ability to filter out the mercury. Its too bad really
I feel that people who are afflicted by a mentally stunted child tend to point fingers at the medicine b/c its easy, removes the blaim from themselves(and please don't think i'm saying they are wrong, obviously in some cases mercury poisoning is probably the more likely cause) but when dealing w/ these cases doesn't it make more sense to blaim the more probably cause, which is probably some other enviromental factor. Like what the mother was eating or drinking during pregnancy, or even after, or even what the parents let the kid be exposed to at school or in the foods that they digest?
thanks for all this info. Its quite suprising actually, I guess I had too much faith in the system. Alot of the articles I'm reading still contradict one another, but they all agree that mercury is of course dangerous, but they argue on how much is dangerous. Why not just remove them completely! lol, well thanks for everyones responses, clears things up. Also read that the reason why not everyone is effected is b/c the mercury only effects those babies that have a weakened ability to filter out the mercury. Its too bad really