A
A.D.S
Guest
I am a believer with an open mind and have posted this question earlier also.
In science, if any thing that cannot be proved directly is assumed hypothetically to be true or false first and then research is conducted to prove it right or wrong.
Researching backwards, they are stuck with a dead end, because the scientific theory of “nothing comes out of nothing” blocks the logical conclusion with no explanation beyond that point.
Whereas, for a Theist God’s preexistence is not at all guided by any scientific law, and hence, aren’t they in an advantageous position for any kind of debate
I must also say something about myself.
I am an Indian Sikh by birth (a branch of Hinduism) with an open mind and respect for all the religions, even Atheists. For me Atheism is also a kind of religion. I tend to see every thing from scientific point of view and hence the above question.
In science, if any thing that cannot be proved directly is assumed hypothetically to be true or false first and then research is conducted to prove it right or wrong.
Researching backwards, they are stuck with a dead end, because the scientific theory of “nothing comes out of nothing” blocks the logical conclusion with no explanation beyond that point.
Whereas, for a Theist God’s preexistence is not at all guided by any scientific law, and hence, aren’t they in an advantageous position for any kind of debate
I must also say something about myself.
I am an Indian Sikh by birth (a branch of Hinduism) with an open mind and respect for all the religions, even Atheists. For me Atheism is also a kind of religion. I tend to see every thing from scientific point of view and hence the above question.