do feminists fall into the same trap they try to argue against?

[Smokey Tuesday]

when you read an article written by a feminist there is often the urge, and in my opinion rightly, to throw it out for having such an overt bias. Emily Martins article about the sperm and egg < http://www.math.jussieu.fr/~daubin/cours/Textes/Martin_EggSperm.pdf > is a key example of this. She constantly refers to the scientific community, which she considers a male domination of women, as dishonestly perpetuating a myth that the egg is penetrated by the sperm. However, when suggesting alternatives, she falls into the same traps that she criticises, namely she wrongly claims that the egg engulfs the sperm.

So my question is, if you agree that feminists have the same or stronger bias than those who they criticise, why should we take them seriously?
Do women have a view on this subject?