massive than earlier stated? and that it was illegal?
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090711/ap_on_go_co/us_domestic_surveillance
MoltarRo: You're right the word "illegal" didn't come up in the article, but apparently you forgot to read the first paragraph. Here it is again:
"The Bush administration built an unprecedented surveillance operation to pull in mountains of information far beyond the warrantless wiretapping previously acknowledged, a team of federal inspectors general reported Friday, questioning the legal basis for the effort but shielding almost all details on grounds they're still too secret to reveal."
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090711/ap_on_go_co/us_domestic_surveillance
MoltarRo: You're right the word "illegal" didn't come up in the article, but apparently you forgot to read the first paragraph. Here it is again:
"The Bush administration built an unprecedented surveillance operation to pull in mountains of information far beyond the warrantless wiretapping previously acknowledged, a team of federal inspectors general reported Friday, questioning the legal basis for the effort but shielding almost all details on grounds they're still too secret to reveal."