brutally flawed? http://www.mb.com.ph/articles/299635/climate-change-study-had-significant-error-experts
Some high lights
The rejected flawed study was backed by Scientist Osvaldo Canziani, who was part of the 2007 Nobel Prize winning Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
When contacted about his backing and the error, he was "too ill to comment"
That the flaw in the report was reported BEFORE it was published but was published with no revision
That the report said a 2.4 Celsius increase in 10 years is actually only a 0.2 increase
Why should we listen, when they are constantly wrong and always on the side of doom and gloom warming?
Remember the Glaciers? Gone in 10 years? wrong
Why do so many people trust them so much?
I didnt say scientists as a whole
I say self interested money grubbing climate scientists that get money, grants, and funding if the world is going to burn
If its not they get nothing.
Some high lights
The rejected flawed study was backed by Scientist Osvaldo Canziani, who was part of the 2007 Nobel Prize winning Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
When contacted about his backing and the error, he was "too ill to comment"
That the flaw in the report was reported BEFORE it was published but was published with no revision
That the report said a 2.4 Celsius increase in 10 years is actually only a 0.2 increase
Why should we listen, when they are constantly wrong and always on the side of doom and gloom warming?
Remember the Glaciers? Gone in 10 years? wrong
Why do so many people trust them so much?
I didnt say scientists as a whole
I say self interested money grubbing climate scientists that get money, grants, and funding if the world is going to burn
If its not they get nothing.