O
OmarMuktar
Guest
...Luke/Mark? I am clearly referring with the chronology of time and event from the book of Matthew. If you are to compare the narrative of Mark and Luke with his testimony, would you be saying that they enrich each others writing, or totally contradicting the testified chronology of Matthew?
Consiquently, the best answer that you have given to me says nothing about chronology of time and event.
The reason I asked this question is to enrich the authenticity of evangelist Mark and Luke. I am totally convinced that the two belongs to the eyewitness period, but I stand with the fact that both of them witnessed nothing, for they are absolutely not an eyewitness to Jesus. (Luke 1:2-3)
Consiquently, the best answer that you have given to me says nothing about chronology of time and event.
The reason I asked this question is to enrich the authenticity of evangelist Mark and Luke. I am totally convinced that the two belongs to the eyewitness period, but I stand with the fact that both of them witnessed nothing, for they are absolutely not an eyewitness to Jesus. (Luke 1:2-3)