IPCC’s claim in agriculture was that rice lands are sources of methane (CH4). This unfortunately did not elicit chief criticisms from the public. But author got irked by this statement in the newspaper sometime 2007. If we evaluate & validate this claim, one can discover that the study is incomprehensive for being incomplete because, in order for rice to grow & mature, CO2 was already pre-taken and thereafter O2 was released by its leaves thru photosynthesis. CH4 will only be realized after harvest (via chemical reaction thru decay) if post waste materials (leaves & stem) are abandoned & left soaked in water. In contrast, it seemed that IPCC’s conclusion ended up bad because CH4 was singled out being identified as the only gas emitted by rice lands probably on the basis that rice is planted in water. Moreover, this study had no scientific scenario of biological & physical experiences as evidence to support or justify that CH4 will finally stop & end up that way as GHG. CH4 naturally occurs if the leaves of rice cease to photosynthesize due to drought during extreme hot environment &/or if there is low concentration of O2 in the area. Therefore, the proper thing to do is to continue studying the flow of gases so that one can determine where or what is the defect? Following the lyrics of the song in the 70’s which goes, “What goes up must come down. Spinning wheel got to go round.” This should be the theme song in the environment (laughter).
To neutralize CH4, it needs O2 and hence, the defect is already identified. Then we can conclude that the world is unknowingly experiencing temporary shortage or loss of O2. At this instance, it would be heroic for IPCC to reverse or alter its conclusion, emphasizing that the world should reproduce more O2 as primary objective than carbon reduction. Instead IPCC ridiculed the world by falsely testifying the promise of what carbon emission reduction holds for the world if ever it will be adopted. Since rice is a major food of Asians, people are then confused. What is then the hidden & ulterior motive of IPCC – to defend UNEP and fortify the purpose of Kyoto Protocol? This is obviously a plain treachery to the people, a conspiracy, for it would place the world into authoritarianism by way of introducing deception? To defame rice lands probably by limiting rice production at the expense of people’s subsistence, agriculture will not anymore be protected and nature will not be preserved. It is crystal clear that the study did not patronize life which is contrary to the functions of FAO (promoting agriculture) & WFP (fighting famine). And for that half-baked study, IPCC surprisingly obtained a Nobel Peace Prize award.
One replier (in defense of UN) commented that the author spoke negative about UN after all its performances. However, the replier did not realize that everything achieved in the past by the mother organization, has been destroyed by UNEP. Just a single major natural disaster (like hurricanes & storms), many people are killed & displaced as well as properties destroyed which is worst than war. GHG again will be aggravated if the destroyed huge plantations thru decay (turning into gaseous state) and will only add up CO2 & CH4 in the atmosphere. At this instance, the tens of billions allocated as seed money for Kyoto Protocol will only end up as financial assistance or aid for humanitarianism & recovery to victims & survivors.
To neutralize CH4, it needs O2 and hence, the defect is already identified. Then we can conclude that the world is unknowingly experiencing temporary shortage or loss of O2. At this instance, it would be heroic for IPCC to reverse or alter its conclusion, emphasizing that the world should reproduce more O2 as primary objective than carbon reduction. Instead IPCC ridiculed the world by falsely testifying the promise of what carbon emission reduction holds for the world if ever it will be adopted. Since rice is a major food of Asians, people are then confused. What is then the hidden & ulterior motive of IPCC – to defend UNEP and fortify the purpose of Kyoto Protocol? This is obviously a plain treachery to the people, a conspiracy, for it would place the world into authoritarianism by way of introducing deception? To defame rice lands probably by limiting rice production at the expense of people’s subsistence, agriculture will not anymore be protected and nature will not be preserved. It is crystal clear that the study did not patronize life which is contrary to the functions of FAO (promoting agriculture) & WFP (fighting famine). And for that half-baked study, IPCC surprisingly obtained a Nobel Peace Prize award.
One replier (in defense of UN) commented that the author spoke negative about UN after all its performances. However, the replier did not realize that everything achieved in the past by the mother organization, has been destroyed by UNEP. Just a single major natural disaster (like hurricanes & storms), many people are killed & displaced as well as properties destroyed which is worst than war. GHG again will be aggravated if the destroyed huge plantations thru decay (turning into gaseous state) and will only add up CO2 & CH4 in the atmosphere. At this instance, the tens of billions allocated as seed money for Kyoto Protocol will only end up as financial assistance or aid for humanitarianism & recovery to victims & survivors.