Diamondback or Ironhorse Mtn bike....?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Edward W
  • Start date Start date
E

Edward W

Guest
Iron horse hands down My first one was a 1.3 hardtail and since then I have had a f/s 4.5 (2) a warrior sport (from "Richards"sporting goods) yahoo wont let me say d###s. and now and MKIII sport and an Azure Comp. I have stoped with the latter two because I dont need to go any further up the chain. Sound like Ive been through a few IH in my time? I have and every one of them were great I just settled on the f/s bikes and have since sold 2 of the previous and 2 are still in the family but I am certain you are looking at the 1.5? If so go for it ...the frame is better built than the diamondback. You are in the "good" lower end with what you are looking at but you will not be disappointed! Go for it and ride hard
 
Which wud be better both are for the same price.... but based on reputation what wud be the best bike for the money.... (Approx. $300)
 
diamond back are good but some parts on it you will find breal easily or are cheap and arent what you expected, some of my friends have had ironhorse bikes and have had no complaints
 
Back
Top