Creationists, what other scientific theories are you going to dispute next?

We all know about the evolution thing. But it seems you're disagreeing with General/Special Relativity now (Yes, gravity and E=mc^2, the space-time continuum etc)

http://www.conservapedia.com/Theory_of_relativity

The idea is that, given that the speed of light in a vacuum is constant, we can ascertain the age of the universe, approximately. So the creationists disagree and go with the 6000 years the bible says. To do this they have to go against one of the strongest theories we have...
@arlhiker, yes that's why the universe can't be 6000 years old...
BUT THE BIBLES SAYS SO! REPENT! THE POWER OF CHRIST COMPELS YOU! *WHACKS WITH BIBLE*
@Lightning from the East
So you're disagreeing with Einstein's Theory of General/Special Relativity.
Good luck proving it.
@Jeanmarie
If by many you mean the overwhelming minority, then yes...
Taking into account only those working in the relevant fields of earth and life sciences, there are about 480,000 scientists, but only about 700 believe in "creation-science" or consider it a valid theory (Robinson 1995). This means that less than 0.15 percent of relevant scientists believe in creationism. And that is just in the United States, which has more creationists than any other industrialized country. In other countries, the number of relevant scientists who accept creationism drops to less than 0.1%
HAHAHAHA only 50? Versus the millions who do?
@mrglass08
Then your God would be an intentionally deceptive God, and I don't think that would be his motive.
 
Back
Top