X
xerxre c
Guest
I think it is completely unfair to China in the new Media coverage made by American Press.
The US Press uses the words such as "OPPRESSION" "HUMAN RIGHT" by the "Communist Government" verses "PEACEFUL" by "Dalai Lama". The US press also use strange phrases such as "Dalai Clique" --- a phrase that would be rarely seen in ANY language. I think the press is completely against China's position and is not giving China any chance to speak for itself.
And also just so you know, Tibet is apart of China, if it wants independance, you think China would give up it's territory that easily? Think of it this way, if, let's say, Texas wanted US to grant it independence, You think US government would give up Texas just because it has "Human Right". Well Texas could go on parades celebrating it's independence, HEY! Parades are "NON-VIOLENT" so if the negotiation fails, and the government use any "FORCE" against me, it would be called as Oppression to Human Right, Right?
The US Press uses the words such as "OPPRESSION" "HUMAN RIGHT" by the "Communist Government" verses "PEACEFUL" by "Dalai Lama". The US press also use strange phrases such as "Dalai Clique" --- a phrase that would be rarely seen in ANY language. I think the press is completely against China's position and is not giving China any chance to speak for itself.
And also just so you know, Tibet is apart of China, if it wants independance, you think China would give up it's territory that easily? Think of it this way, if, let's say, Texas wanted US to grant it independence, You think US government would give up Texas just because it has "Human Right". Well Texas could go on parades celebrating it's independence, HEY! Parades are "NON-VIOLENT" so if the negotiation fails, and the government use any "FORCE" against me, it would be called as Oppression to Human Right, Right?