Clinton wasn't responsible for ANYTHING that happened during Bush's term, Can libs blame Bush during Obama's?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chae
  • Start date Start date
C

Chae

Guest
By the liberal standard set over the past few years will libs not be able to blame Bush for whatever happens during Obama's term since they wouldn't allow anything to be blamed on Clinton or will they be asshoIe hypocrites and blame everything on Bush?Liberals wouldn't accept Clinton's screw ups so I'm not accepting Bush's. Fair is fair.
 
For 8 years you blamed bush's screwups on clinton, so for the next 8 years obama's screwups get blamed on bush.fair is fair
 
Depends on what you're talking about. The recession we're currently in will hamper Obama's abilities to do anything but work to pull us out of it. Bush carries a lot of blame for that.
 
Man that is COOL. You turned our words right around on us!I'm speechless...I surrender. I'm going to go tune in Rush Limbaugh right now and get busy becoming a Republican.Man, I just don't know what I was thinking being a Democrat all those years.
 
First answer is typical, ignorant, hypocritical BS. While I do agree that the acting president has very limited power over what's happening in the country today, that doesn't change the fact that it is his reponsability, so just like the left blamed bush for everything that was wrong in their fat, miserable, poor lives, on day one of his term, so now do we get to point fingers at the great ObamaFail and ask him why our lives aren't super yet.Fair's fair, is that the word we're using? Yeah, that's about right.
 
Good for you, it's Obama's presidency now so he has to take the blame for the bad if he takes credit for the good.
 
i agree with you but the libs will not and bush will be blamed for anything that obama can not fix
 
Back
Top