K
Kidding Y
Guest
.
.
.
.
can you please tell me if each of question is TRUE or FALSE, and explain why you said T/F.
1. Baier agrees with Kant that liars act on morally impossible maxims.
2. Baier would grade different moralities to determine whether a moral rule is spurious.
3. One of the points Anscombe is making with the example of the transition from "is" to "owes" is that Hume discovered a deep philosophical problem in his discussion of the relation between "is" and "ought" statements.
4. Anscombe argues it is best to avoid the moral use of "ought" because it is no longer based on the religious law conception of ethics.
.
.
.
can you please tell me if each of question is TRUE or FALSE, and explain why you said T/F.
1. Baier agrees with Kant that liars act on morally impossible maxims.
2. Baier would grade different moralities to determine whether a moral rule is spurious.
3. One of the points Anscombe is making with the example of the transition from "is" to "owes" is that Hume discovered a deep philosophical problem in his discussion of the relation between "is" and "ought" statements.
4. Anscombe argues it is best to avoid the moral use of "ought" because it is no longer based on the religious law conception of ethics.