Boycott STN (Storethe.net) and Vizz (Vizz.tv) thread

Well if they are charged as direct contributors to the finance of this site and which they in fact are if they subscribed then it is not the question of finding the clause which charge them but rather they one which saves them and there is no such thing. They would be treated as partners/helpers of the site admins/staff/mods etc.
 
lol seems like this thing is working these motherfuckers are already chickening out,APB is coming to get ya you lickle faggots!

By the time I was posting,the site was open for public sign ups,now they've closed it to prevent the feds and the APB from signing up(and are probably going to ban those who registered at around the time khan made this thread lol)

more links:
http://www.mpaa.org/ReportPiracy/ReportPiracy.aspx
https://www.riaa.com/reportpiracy.php

Piracy is very illegal in sweden,cashing in on it as I hear makes a capital offence.These guys are stupid enough to go the money way yet too careless that a simple (but l33+) whois easily yields names,phone numbers and addresses that easily lead to them.
If you wanna know the name of the person that the site is registered to,just go to my earlier whois link and click on admin-c.You can even give him a ring if you want ;)
 
I don't boycott anything just because someone says so. If the sites are shit, I won't use them. I don't/haven't used some good sites just because of habit with others.

As for the Swedish IP. The frontend is hosted from a Swedish VPS but the tracker data and seedboxes are at OVH.

And as I said elsewhere, the owners are sceners who have been running p2l ftp topsites for a while.
 
I think your mind is not clear about the whole filesharing concept. It is beneficial to the society if governed by some morals, ethics and rules.

Btw the scene is not an altruistic entity blessing us with it's generosity.There are some seriously bad people involved .Some who would gladly see you rot in Hell if it served their egos and helped move them up the food chain a little.
The scene also as a whole hates file shares and any scener who leaks to a tracker I am fairly confident does so purely with some "personal gain" in mind.

Thanks for saying so that is the reason I am against STN and Vizz. If you let practices like these to continue freely then one day there would be another IdolEyes on another forum saying "There are some seriously bad people involved in bittorrent." That is ironic you attack bad peoples there but you defend them here.

I agree with you when you say some bad people are there but some very good people are also there. Let us condemn both the bad people here and there. Let us praise the good people of here and there.
While I'm at it here's another out of context manglement for you to stew on.
"And about the scene entertainment industry's hard work! i really appreciate their work. These are the people who take risk and who do a lot of hard work in coding creating, crackingdistributing , reversingdesigning etc etc. And then people like STN the scene and Vizz bt trackers come to exploit their hard work and also put them in danger ( of financial failure) in the process of making some money for their own personal gains.
OK most trackers don't do it for the money but nevertheless can't you see the hypocrisy that you are spouting here ?"

There are some problems in your understanding of this whole file sharing thing. I consider file sharing or sharing any thing with others as a feature of a really developed, exceptionally advanced society. The problem is a lack of understanding and low standards of intellectualism. If you share a file without harming the sales of a particular commodity then actually you are helping the society.I would clarify this by an example.Let us assume a producer make a movie. He achieves his targeted income including income from cinemas and video release. If the same movie is also released on torrent sites there would be additional viewers of the movie without harming anyone. Many people would get benefit but there would be no loss for anyone. But if the realease of the movie on torrent sites actually harms the income of that producer then he has every right not to be pleased with it. Now as a civilized people living in a society it should be our duty to act in a way to not harm that particular person responsible for the making of that movie. If a torrenter after seeing this movie buys it then that is additional income for that producer. If a potential buyer of that movie get it via the torrent sites and don't buy it then this is the loss. Now here comes the responsibility of the people involved in file sharing. We should encourage the users to actually buy the products they liked after viewing or testing it after downloading from a torrent site. In that way we would be actually making positive impacts on the sales of a particular commodity. Let me give you fictitious analysis to clear the idea to you. Take the above example of the movie:-
suppose it has 10000 potential buyers and all of them buy the product. The actual producer would get his targeted income. Now after the release of the movie on bittorrent there would be additional viewers of the movie as it would be provided to them free. Let us further suppose if the movie was not provided to them for free they would not have bothered to view it. Suppose some of these free viewers like the movie and actually buy it. What would happen! ... There would be additional sales which means additional income for the businesses.

If you let people like STN and Vizz to do what they like they would get the money from that bittorrent user who is also a potential buyer of the movie after viewing it. Now these potential buyer would be reluctant to buy the actual product as they would have already paid for it.

I am acually hoping for a future scenario in which educated and good people run the torrent sites and they make attempts to inform their users the necessity of buying the actual products by adopting measure like putting message "Buy it if you like it" on each torrent detailed page or anything like it. They would be actually helping the society in that way. That would lead to greater sales, greater satisfaction for the people who would get greater range of products for free and so on. In that case the surveys and analysis would suggest to the governments and businesses that filesharing is actually beneficial to them and there would be a time when it would no longer be considered as illegal. I think now there should be no doubts in your mind about file sharing.
 
there are quite a lot of ways to make an interpretation of this, but one of the ones that come to my mind is that it will most probably be targeted by authorities as a declared site to profit out of piracy.
And one major evidence is that everyone there is a "customer".

Too dangerous for me. I won't touch it with a pole.
 
As for the Swedish IP. The frontend is hosted from a Swedish VPS but the tracker data and seedboxes are at OVH.

Yeah just saw that and from what I've read,it appears as though this host of theirs specialises in this line of work lol.
It says from their website that they'd go to any length to protect their customers.
http://www.prq.se/?intl=1
Given that assurance I'd re-open sign ups if I was them,more people=more money.APB aint gonna do shit if the host refuses to hand in evidence.
 
Back
Top