BitTorrent Has Cancer...

[You Ask I Answer]

Even though that study is utterly flawed, it's a given that bt is the dominant form of p2p at the moment. That's really at the core of the OP's point.

As for usenet not being popular. I really, really don't understand how people spend money on seedboxes but won't spend ten bucks a month to leech all they can. It's all about epenis.

The problem with seedboxes is it fundamentally changes the way users use sites and the way people share. And I think it does so in a way that undermines some of the joy of bittorrent. Sure, not everybody is affected by them, but enough people strive to be at the top of the peer list that the scene has changed in principle.

 

[passenbij]

I think BT is far from being replaced. It is far too readily available and user friendly to be ousted by the likes of usenet. Usenet has a long ways to go in terms of interface before the public embraces it.

 

[Lali Xox]

amen!!

:happy: unless they

 

[livelaughdance]

Rart, just look at UseNeXT and all similar marketing programs, they make it easy for everyone in return for money.

I say enjoy it while it lasts.

It has cancer, this defect will mean no sudden death; slowly wasting away describes it better.

 

[pedroeduardo]

u have to be an idiot finding connections between bt protocol and invite trading/selling

 

[oreochan]

u have to be an idiot finding connections between bt protocol and invite trading/selling

What are you going on about? Who's comparing protocol and invite trading, RAB?


-bd :ermm: