big boobs...

Oh fucking lord I can't believe I read 40 pages of BOOBS...
I don't have problems with my boobs actually :tongue: they're a B cup

Morelos: The "a sample group of 200 is officially a 'large sample' and uses normal-curve (z-score as opposed to t-score) techniques, though, if double-blind.": Depends on the Universe you're studying. If you're studying men over the world it is; indeed; a very small sample to say it is a correct study, so it's not a large sample.

"statistics" translates, loosely, into "the art of using numbers to lie.": There are two kind of stadistics, descriptive and inferential. When you use the descriptive one there is no lying, because you make the study of all the individuals there are. When you use the inferential; you use a sample and then make inferences (sp?) supposing it will be a constant on the rest of the not-studied people. There is an error thing, there I accept you say lying with numbers.

_Kitana_: Darksinner won't have to worry about that. breast feeding isn't for me. It is not about that. It is necessary for the kid to develope well for you to breast feed him. It's not that "is not for me", it's a must. The only reason why you shouldn't breast feed (I'm guessing, among others) is that you have AIDS/HIV. If that'snot the case, you're not being fair to your future child.

I know its natural but if my mom told me i spent the first years sucking on her tits. i would be scared for life.: So you're still scared? You seem very comfortable with the subject of boobs.

And another thing...I can't believe you guys did'n mention penis untill the 35th page!!
 
It is NOT necessary. I was a formula kid, and I turned out just fine. My sister's first two kids, however, were breast fed and now have a host of health problems, including allergies, frequent sinus infections, etc. Her third kid is a formula baby, and while she does have problems, they are not nearly as bad as her siblings'.

And no, there is NOTHING wrong with my sister or her milk.
 
I have one thing to say. It is my body, if i chose not breast feed my kids it is my choice. I should not be guilt tripped into feeling like i must feed them are they will get no nutrition. I am uncomfortable with it
 
Hun. I doubt your boobs are bigger then mine. LoL in all honesty. Depending on how hard you work, it could go down two full cups size. Reduction can only safely take your boobs down 1/2 to a full cup size.

I believe in this thread. There is a link that shows all the health risks to geting a brest reduction.
 
I don't have those problems thankfully, although I am empathetic to your plight.
I am small enough that I'd prefer it be acceptable to walk around with your nips pointing out. LOL! (I do it anyways, but have to double up on my tops to hide 'em.)

"it feels good to be free!!!!!!"
-Womens lib of bras for all!
 
Woah, I have never tried to make you feel guilty. I'm just talking about the facts; I read a recent study where it said it is the best thing, even with existant formulas. But blah, yes, it is your body. Definitely not mine.
 
err thats not what i got when i read this? I am being un fair to my future child



There is to my knowledge no dramatic evdents to show children who are breast feed are healthier then kids who aren't

If so please show me? I would be curious to know...
 
There are some studies through WIC that show that if you bottle feed your child they have a 30% increased chance of being overwieght. I bottle fed all 3 of my kids and only my oldest is overwieght. I wouldnt worry too much about it kit, kids are healthy as long as they are fed and get that first day's breast milk because that has all of your anitbodies in it. That is why babies under 1 year rarely get chickenpox if the mom has already had it.
 
Back
Top