K
KiRby
Guest
table.comparison { border-width: 1px 1px 1px 1px; border-spacing: 2px; } table.comparison th { text-align:right; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 1px; padding: 3px 3px 3px 3px; border-color: gray gray gray gray; background-color: #cccccc; -moz-border-radius: 0px 0px 0px 0px; } table.comparison td { text-align:left; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 1px; padding: 3px 3px 3px 3px; background-color: #cccccc; -moz-border-radius: 0px 0px 0px 0px; } table.comparison td.has { background-color:#8EBB8E; } table.comparison td.label { font-weight:bold;text-align:left; } The latest derivative move: The Journal has launched Digits, a group blog about technology. The logo has ones and zeroes in it, even. It is an answer to the Times's Bits, a group blog about technology. Get it? You can tell they're both about technology, because technology uses binary digits. Also, pics and capsule biographies of the writers! How chummy. Let's compare them:
Blog
Bits Digits Logos
Business * Innovation * Technology * Society Technology News and Insights White Maleness
75 percent (9 out of 12 writers)
University of Chicago University of Chicago Wackiest Writer
Matt Richtel, prostitute impostor Jessica Vascellaro, Cyprus party girl
If only the likes of Richtel and Vascellaro expressed their rich inner lives on the sites. There's nothing particularly bloggy about either newspaper's offering; they just host slightly shorter articles that do not appear in the print edition. The move is really driven by advertisers: By calling their expanded technology sections "blogs," the papers cater to gadget advertisers' desire to reach tech-obsessed readers who are unlikely to read the print version of the paper — while not alarming print-first fundamentalists who balk at the idea of online-only articles.
If only the articles had more to add. There's a numbing sameness to Bits and Digits, as they engage in the new pack journalism and race to cover the big technology story of the day. Did you know this was Amazon.com's "best-ever" Christmas? Both sites will enlighten you.
My advice to both of the tech-blog imitators: Drop the cutesy sub-brands — "Bits" and "Digits" will never be more valuable than the "New York Times" or the "Wall Street Journal" names — and just start running stories online, without ghettoizing them in special blogs. Either they're worthy of the papers' editorial standards, or they're not — a binary equation that whoever named these blogs ought to be able to solve.
[IMG]http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?p=1[/IMG]