Atheists, how do you refute this scientific evidence for a young earth?

Love and Faith

New member
The sun burns at a constant rate. If the earth were truly millions of years old, the sun would have been large enough to touch the earth. The equation of something traveling a given distance divided by the speed it is traveling:

Time=Distance/Speed

When you apply this to stars, it turns out to be millions of years. Since astronomers measure distances of stars in many different ways, the Distance is correct and the Speed is correct.

The only variable not touched is Time. Time is shown (with experimental support) to distort with gravity and speed. Einstein's theory of gravity indicates that gravity distorts time.

When matter is dense enough, the gravity is so intense, light bends back onto itself (the event horizon). Theoretically, the universe has boundaries. (If the universe had no boundaries then all the net gravitational forces would cancel out.)

If the universe is growing, then at one point it has expanded past the state that it was surrounded by an event horizon. As matter passed out of the event horizon, the horizon itself had to shrink to nothing. This means that at one point, the earth was virtually FROZEN in time.

This explains why the universe can be less than 10,000 years old and still allow for the light of distant stars to travel that distance to reach earth
Dass: Carbon dating is inaccurate. Plus, there is no proof the decay has been always consistent.
 
Back
Top