Artic Exotics
New member
I love to read the new Google Group reader...I have been exposed to volumes of goofyness! Validates everything I suspected in 1983. Doncha miss Usenet...
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
As we join at the dinner table...
- Thread starter Artic Exotics
- Start date
wild_legs76
New member
In article
??????Cool??????
New member
On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 16:22:17 -0700, Dan Abel wrote:
Not only that, but the text went off screen. It was just too hard to
read.
--
Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground.
Not only that, but the text went off screen. It was just too hard to
read.
--
Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground.
Re: [email protected]
Dan Abel wrote:
Advanced search seems to have been disappeared too.
The ultimate destruction of the once proud Deja News is now complete.
Dan Abel wrote:
Advanced search seems to have been disappeared too.
The ultimate destruction of the once proud Deja News is now complete.
Bastian Iramasius
New member
Re: 9b846bee-d0db-4d31-b121-80896b31e499@glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com
Mr. Bill wrote:
And since we're on the subject of you being an idiot, learn to quote a
Usenet message. Doing so requires approximately a 4th grade level of
ability. I know it's a stretch, but at least give it a try.
Mr. Bill wrote:
And since we're on the subject of you being an idiot, learn to quote a
Usenet message. Doing so requires approximately a 4th grade level of
ability. I know it's a stretch, but at least give it a try.
In article ,
"Nunya Bidnits" wrote:
Worked for me the old way.
--
Dan Abel
Petaluma, California USA
[email protected]
"Nunya Bidnits" wrote:
Worked for me the old way.
--
Dan Abel
Petaluma, California USA
[email protected]
Re: [email protected]
Dan Abel wrote:
True. They *improved* it by making it simpler, i.e., taking away the more
complex functions which represented the only real value GG had in the first
place.
Does this mean they think their users are too stupid to make use of advanced
search, or are they on the way to abandoning the historical archive of
Usenet entirely?
MartyB
Dan Abel wrote:
True. They *improved* it by making it simpler, i.e., taking away the more
complex functions which represented the only real value GG had in the first
place.
Does this mean they think their users are too stupid to make use of advanced
search, or are they on the way to abandoning the historical archive of
Usenet entirely?
MartyB