O
One in a million
Guest
RESOLVED: Sanctuary cities are morally justified.
I'm debating with the negative case of this issue, I just wondered what arguments you would have against this standpoint (I don't want to post this entire case, so just focus on the issue in itself), the gist being that sanctuary cities are illegal, people shouldn't come into our country whenever they want, and that sanctuary cities create disrespect for the rule of law.
If you debated against this resolution, what would be your main argument?
I'm debating with the negative case of this issue, I just wondered what arguments you would have against this standpoint (I don't want to post this entire case, so just focus on the issue in itself), the gist being that sanctuary cities are illegal, people shouldn't come into our country whenever they want, and that sanctuary cities create disrespect for the rule of law.
If you debated against this resolution, what would be your main argument?