The objective is to make a big endwork (mini-thesis) this year. We are free to choose our subjects.
I have given some thoughts about argumentation theory. However, the subject is way too broad, meaning i wouldn't be able to go very in-depth so i need to limit to what part of argumentation theory i will present. Our teacher used to say, if you think your subject is narrowed down enough, then narrow it down by another level. He would go as far consider the military boots in 1942 in a battle in Africa a perfect subject.
So i have no idea where i should begin to narrow the argumentation theory down as everything seems so coherent. Some help on suggesting a sub part of argumentation would be. Something interesting that will catch the reader's mind.
Thank you
I have given some thoughts about argumentation theory. However, the subject is way too broad, meaning i wouldn't be able to go very in-depth so i need to limit to what part of argumentation theory i will present. Our teacher used to say, if you think your subject is narrowed down enough, then narrow it down by another level. He would go as far consider the military boots in 1942 in a battle in Africa a perfect subject.
So i have no idea where i should begin to narrow the argumentation theory down as everything seems so coherent. Some help on suggesting a sub part of argumentation would be. Something interesting that will catch the reader's mind.
Thank you