Argument For Caesar To Be The King
Proposed: “Caesar is to be our king, with all rights and privileges of the title; A hereditary position, the final word on all laws and social censorship to be his.”
Caesar is a great general and he has the support of maybe the whole city. Many people in the city would even like him to become king. I see he has the qualities and standarRAB to be king but I don’t believe in kings. The only type of ruler I would favor would be a limited ruler or a representative ruler.
A limited ruler still has the power of ruler but the people can over ride his rule with a majority vote. This means that if enough people think the taxes are to high it will go down. If enough people think they are not treated equally they can vote against it. So what ever it is the people have say in every matter that concerns them. Opposed to an absolute ruler who has the final word on all laws and social censorship. The other type of ruler I favor is a representative ruler. The people appoint a representative ruler and that ruler has limited power (like presidency in the U.S.). A representative ruler speaks for the people and decides for the people. A representative ruler’s rule can be changed be the senate or like in the U.S. today Congress.
I feel that Caesar is not yet ready for the title of an absolute king because his power can cloud his judgment making him a different person. Julius Caesar is in fact a great general but that is a military position not in relation to a king. I can already see that Caesar will change completely if he becomes king. When the senate came over to him he did not stand to greet them but when they did not greet him he was not pleased with it. In that you can already see that Caesar will be a changed man when he comes to power. If his power is not limited and it stays absolute I see that he is not fit to be king. The people will like him now but later they might want the death of him.
Proposed: “Caesar is to be our king, with all rights and privileges of the title; A hereditary position, the final word on all laws and social censorship to be his.”
Caesar is a great general and he has the support of maybe the whole city. Many people in the city would even like him to become king. I see he has the qualities and standarRAB to be king but I don’t believe in kings. The only type of ruler I would favor would be a limited ruler or a representative ruler.
A limited ruler still has the power of ruler but the people can over ride his rule with a majority vote. This means that if enough people think the taxes are to high it will go down. If enough people think they are not treated equally they can vote against it. So what ever it is the people have say in every matter that concerns them. Opposed to an absolute ruler who has the final word on all laws and social censorship. The other type of ruler I favor is a representative ruler. The people appoint a representative ruler and that ruler has limited power (like presidency in the U.S.). A representative ruler speaks for the people and decides for the people. A representative ruler’s rule can be changed be the senate or like in the U.S. today Congress.
I feel that Caesar is not yet ready for the title of an absolute king because his power can cloud his judgment making him a different person. Julius Caesar is in fact a great general but that is a military position not in relation to a king. I can already see that Caesar will change completely if he becomes king. When the senate came over to him he did not stand to greet them but when they did not greet him he was not pleased with it. In that you can already see that Caesar will be a changed man when he comes to power. If his power is not limited and it stays absolute I see that he is not fit to be king. The people will like him now but later they might want the death of him.