This is what scientist W.A.Demski wrote:
"Doubting Darwinian orthodoxy is comparable to opposing the party line of a Stalinist regime.What would you do if you were in Stalin's Russia and wanted to argue that Lysenko was wrong? You might point to paradoxes and tensions on Lysenko's theory of genetics, but you could not say that Lysenko was fundamentally wrong or offer an alternative that clearly contradicted Lysenko.That's the situation wer'e in.".Lysenko was a rogue atheist soviet scientist.
Andrea based on what?
"Doubting Darwinian orthodoxy is comparable to opposing the party line of a Stalinist regime.What would you do if you were in Stalin's Russia and wanted to argue that Lysenko was wrong? You might point to paradoxes and tensions on Lysenko's theory of genetics, but you could not say that Lysenko was fundamentally wrong or offer an alternative that clearly contradicted Lysenko.That's the situation wer'e in.".Lysenko was a rogue atheist soviet scientist.
Andrea based on what?