For example this photo:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/44920196@N04/4138883438/
All that the girl did was paste a picture of herself into a photo that someone else took. It doesn't really seem like true photography to me. Digitar graphic art might be nice, but I don't think it is the same thing as photography. Am I just being old fashioned (even though I'm only 15) or do ethical issues actually exist? It just kind of makes me mad when people get credit for digitally altering photographs.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/44920196@N04/4138883438/
All that the girl did was paste a picture of herself into a photo that someone else took. It doesn't really seem like true photography to me. Digitar graphic art might be nice, but I don't think it is the same thing as photography. Am I just being old fashioned (even though I'm only 15) or do ethical issues actually exist? It just kind of makes me mad when people get credit for digitally altering photographs.