RitchWilliams
New member
have angered the gods' crowd? It used to be 'global warming' but since the 'globe' was not, in fact, 'warming, it is now 'climate change'. This allows the followers of this religion to blame any unusual climatological event on the evils of man while ignoring the 'sunny days'. As a result, are these folks not the 21st century equivalent to the 'they must have angered the gods!' crowd using quasi-science to justify the actions of their god? Are their representatives in congress not establishing a religion in our nation and building monuments to this god with every windmill and solar panel? I'm sure the Hawaiian islanders felt very rational and informed when blaming the volcano's eruption on some poor sap as a justification before throwing his butt into the smoking crater.
Hey, I'm all for a clean environment and cheap energy. I mean that is just common sense. But come on, do we really have to create a whole new religion and 'belief system' with associated 'consequences' if we don't worship the weather god?
General: And, I could find you just as solid, tested, undeniable evidence to the contrary. The skepticism, it seems, is not an 'internet' phenomenon as your article claims, but a growing skepticism in the scientific community based on growing evidence, again, to the contrary. So, the debate continues. Is there or is there not a god?
Hey, I'm all for a clean environment and cheap energy. I mean that is just common sense. But come on, do we really have to create a whole new religion and 'belief system' with associated 'consequences' if we don't worship the weather god?
General: And, I could find you just as solid, tested, undeniable evidence to the contrary. The skepticism, it seems, is not an 'internet' phenomenon as your article claims, but a growing skepticism in the scientific community based on growing evidence, again, to the contrary. So, the debate continues. Is there or is there not a god?