Its a wonderful life.
New member
Happened about a 100 years ago.The United States Supreme Court held that it was permissible to shoot an officer who displays a gun with intent to commit a warrantless arrest based on insufficient cause.
Anyone know the name of this case? And have there been any other rulings that have overturned this ruling sense?
Obviously you don't anything about law. If supreme court rulings were not law, they would not be enforcable. Mc durp
Oh, sorry. Lol. We were disagreeing on a different thing. I thought you meant rulings in general, not this particular one.
CJ, u are 100% wrong. In the matter of self defence. You can kill anyone, even the president.
Anyone know the name of this case? And have there been any other rulings that have overturned this ruling sense?
Obviously you don't anything about law. If supreme court rulings were not law, they would not be enforcable. Mc durp
Oh, sorry. Lol. We were disagreeing on a different thing. I thought you meant rulings in general, not this particular one.
CJ, u are 100% wrong. In the matter of self defence. You can kill anyone, even the president.