Let me preface this question by saying I do not endorse a particular brand of dog food.
Recently I've been thinking about dog food and how so many people have differing opinions about what is best for their dogs' health and well-being.
We used to feed our dog a mainstream pet store brand. He did fine on it. Then I learned that there were better foods out there that had better ingredients. We switched to a "premium" brand. He doesn't seem to have changed much from the food change, maybe a nicer coat.
Now I work at an animal hospital and I went to a seminar led by a prescription brands' veterinarians. Obviously they were biased but I couldn't help thinking that these foods can't be as bad as people would think. They also have a line of non-prescription foods that have been shot down by the critics as being one of the worst brands out there.
Then there are those that feed only raw. Dogs have been domesticated for hundreds of years now, so why the necessity for raw? Is it only for the lack of preservatives a raw diet consists of?
I guess I'm trying to figure out what, as a good dog owner, I should be feeding without compromising my dog's health and my marketing/ingredient naivete. I have no problem shelling out the big bucks for the top brands, but are they really all that spectacular?
What do you feed your dogs and why? Where did you learn about the food you've chosen? Have you seen a noticeable change in your dog's behavior/appearance if you have changed from one method to another like I did?
Recently I've been thinking about dog food and how so many people have differing opinions about what is best for their dogs' health and well-being.
We used to feed our dog a mainstream pet store brand. He did fine on it. Then I learned that there were better foods out there that had better ingredients. We switched to a "premium" brand. He doesn't seem to have changed much from the food change, maybe a nicer coat.
Now I work at an animal hospital and I went to a seminar led by a prescription brands' veterinarians. Obviously they were biased but I couldn't help thinking that these foods can't be as bad as people would think. They also have a line of non-prescription foods that have been shot down by the critics as being one of the worst brands out there.
Then there are those that feed only raw. Dogs have been domesticated for hundreds of years now, so why the necessity for raw? Is it only for the lack of preservatives a raw diet consists of?
I guess I'm trying to figure out what, as a good dog owner, I should be feeding without compromising my dog's health and my marketing/ingredient naivete. I have no problem shelling out the big bucks for the top brands, but are they really all that spectacular?
What do you feed your dogs and why? Where did you learn about the food you've chosen? Have you seen a noticeable change in your dog's behavior/appearance if you have changed from one method to another like I did?