S
Suzy-Q
Guest
Hello To Everyone -
I wanted to start this new thread just so I don't derail other peoples threaRAB. I sure do appreciate knowing my frienRAB here have been thinking about me. Well, I made the trip to the big city. My sister who is seeing a hand specialist at this hospital (NE Baptist) came with me. Thank goodness for that cuz I'd have been lost, lost, lost!
Well, I should focus on the important parts. I had what has to have been one of the most thorough consultations ever. This neurosurgeon spine specialist spend 1 hr and 40 minutes with us. He asked me about 100 questions and actually took notes! That was a first for me. He did an exam. He asked me respectfully to share what my current surgeon's diagnosis was 'as I understand it'. He asked me what my current surgeon planned to do to help me. When I told him my doc would do a decompression at L3 at the least and possibly a fusion at that level- he asked if I would be so patient to allow him to review my latest MRI again. He asked to explain my surgeon's reason for refusing to use BMP. And here is the important part - he listened. He never hurried. I was able to go through all of my questions and concerns. What he said was logical and it was said with great calm. He requested the actual c scan before he would make a definite diagnosis on my hardware. Everything about him was professional. He did not make a single disparaging remark about my first surgery or my surgeon. He did not indulge in a single childish or egotistical slip. It was entirely a relief not to have to deal with any such nonsense.
Diagnosis: non-union (yep, failed fusion). This he feels is utterly unequivical. Every one of my diagnostic tests and all of my symptoms and my recovery history support the diagnosis. He feels my left L4 pedical screw is loose and and suspects the c scan may show that the right L4 screw is losening. He does not feel that the stenosis or the disks at L3-4 or L5-S1 is significant or requires surgical treatment.
Treatment: Revision surgery to fuse L4-L5 - would do a posterolateral and interbody fusion using cadaver bone and BMP (at my request) with instrumentation and an external electronic bone growth stimulator for 6 months or until substabtially fused. No brace. Aquatherapy at 6 wks. Out of work 3 months.
We discussed BMP in detail. I requested to use it for the posteriolateral fusion and he agreed. I was surprised to learn that he and the hospital are not using it for interbody fusion because of some more recent cases where the stuff 'got out' and entrapped nerves and created stenosis. He explained this policy may change as the details are learned that may put fears to rest but for now - no interbody use of BMP. Thus, that would have to be done with cadaver bone since a hip harvest would not produce the size of bone needed. And that is about it minus a hundred details.
I liked the man very much and his deportment and demeanor suit me to a T. I did not ask about his PA! But I will. So, I am very glad to say it was not a waste of time. QCook - I sure did think of you and do indeed wish I had a few more opinions lined up. But with full-time work, this is as fast as I can go.
I am not decided. There are some important issues to settle with my work and FMLA and so on. I am not sure if I will seek a 3rd opinion. I'm going to proceed with this surgeon and book the surgery. In any case, it would take 8 weeks to get me in so I should have enough time to get a 3rd opinion if I want it.
I'm so far beyond tired. I don't need sleep, I need a coma! I'm thinking about you, Schragie and Lori - thank you to all. I'm going to hit the hay and I'll talk to you tomorrow night. Suzy-Q
I wanted to start this new thread just so I don't derail other peoples threaRAB. I sure do appreciate knowing my frienRAB here have been thinking about me. Well, I made the trip to the big city. My sister who is seeing a hand specialist at this hospital (NE Baptist) came with me. Thank goodness for that cuz I'd have been lost, lost, lost!
Well, I should focus on the important parts. I had what has to have been one of the most thorough consultations ever. This neurosurgeon spine specialist spend 1 hr and 40 minutes with us. He asked me about 100 questions and actually took notes! That was a first for me. He did an exam. He asked me respectfully to share what my current surgeon's diagnosis was 'as I understand it'. He asked me what my current surgeon planned to do to help me. When I told him my doc would do a decompression at L3 at the least and possibly a fusion at that level- he asked if I would be so patient to allow him to review my latest MRI again. He asked to explain my surgeon's reason for refusing to use BMP. And here is the important part - he listened. He never hurried. I was able to go through all of my questions and concerns. What he said was logical and it was said with great calm. He requested the actual c scan before he would make a definite diagnosis on my hardware. Everything about him was professional. He did not make a single disparaging remark about my first surgery or my surgeon. He did not indulge in a single childish or egotistical slip. It was entirely a relief not to have to deal with any such nonsense.
Diagnosis: non-union (yep, failed fusion). This he feels is utterly unequivical. Every one of my diagnostic tests and all of my symptoms and my recovery history support the diagnosis. He feels my left L4 pedical screw is loose and and suspects the c scan may show that the right L4 screw is losening. He does not feel that the stenosis or the disks at L3-4 or L5-S1 is significant or requires surgical treatment.
Treatment: Revision surgery to fuse L4-L5 - would do a posterolateral and interbody fusion using cadaver bone and BMP (at my request) with instrumentation and an external electronic bone growth stimulator for 6 months or until substabtially fused. No brace. Aquatherapy at 6 wks. Out of work 3 months.
We discussed BMP in detail. I requested to use it for the posteriolateral fusion and he agreed. I was surprised to learn that he and the hospital are not using it for interbody fusion because of some more recent cases where the stuff 'got out' and entrapped nerves and created stenosis. He explained this policy may change as the details are learned that may put fears to rest but for now - no interbody use of BMP. Thus, that would have to be done with cadaver bone since a hip harvest would not produce the size of bone needed. And that is about it minus a hundred details.
I liked the man very much and his deportment and demeanor suit me to a T. I did not ask about his PA! But I will. So, I am very glad to say it was not a waste of time. QCook - I sure did think of you and do indeed wish I had a few more opinions lined up. But with full-time work, this is as fast as I can go.
I am not decided. There are some important issues to settle with my work and FMLA and so on. I am not sure if I will seek a 3rd opinion. I'm going to proceed with this surgeon and book the surgery. In any case, it would take 8 weeks to get me in so I should have enough time to get a 3rd opinion if I want it.
I'm so far beyond tired. I don't need sleep, I need a coma! I'm thinking about you, Schragie and Lori - thank you to all. I'm going to hit the hay and I'll talk to you tomorrow night. Suzy-Q