2006 Acura RSX or 2002 BMW 330 Ci Coupe?

  • Thread starter Thread starter samantha
  • Start date Start date
S

samantha

Guest
I might buy one of these and wanted to see which one was more liked...

Acura

http://www.carmax.com/enUS/view-car/default.html?AVi=2&id=5409940&D=60&ASTc=2006%20acura%20rsx&zip=92805&No=0&Ep=Carpage%20Main&Rp=R&PP=20&sV=List&CD=190+8+9&Q=daab845b-43b9-4b06-8ee7-35571bfe7d12


BMW

http://www.carmax.com/enUS/view-car/default.html?AVi=1&id=5341570&D=60&ASTc=2002%20bmw%20330%20Ci&zip=92805&No=0&Ep=Carpage%20Main&Rp=R&PP=20&sV=List&Q=366cb189-5047-4580-a746-dc1e2c994dec
 
RSX will be the better choice because the BMW is 2002 so the repairs will seriously kill you and for the money you put into all the repairs can be used on tunning the RSX.
 
performance wise Bimmer. also you need to consider the climate of your surrounding. The BMW is rear wheel drive, which is terrible in snow. RSX is about 197hp, while the BMW is an inline 6 engine that puts out 236-250hp.

If i were planning on keeping the car for awhile, I'll probably get the RSX.

good luck whatever you plan on buying.
 
RSX all the way man...

that ones a no brainer

bmw's are elitist POS, people think because they cost more they must be better. see how the BMW engines running at 150k, if it makes it there

update: hp isnt everything, it actually has more to do with your power to weight ratio for ACTUAL speed. look up videos of the hyundai genesis... it eats a car that has 100hp more
 
They are both great cars. The BMW is RWD, has more mileage, is 4 yrs older, and the ownership cost is higher. The Acura is barelly broken in, is FWD, and lower ownership costs. The Acura is a much better car , you pay a little more, but its much better then the BMW.
 
Back
Top