Search results

Who ever said media was supposed to be realistic? It is because of the standard of looks used in media. Here is what they usually use. http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/HotScientist Just look at the, umm, dress code for more examples of unrealistic.

Male: http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/AlwaysMale Female: http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/AlwaysFemale ^Applies to media, but media reflects society. Also, masculine = dominance, feminine = submission.

Male: http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/AlwaysMale Female: http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/AlwaysFemale ^Applies to media, but media reflects society. Also, masculine = dominance, feminine = submission.

Yes they are, men talk to get a point across. So do women, but they also enjoy talking for the sake of talking, like for fun.

Male: http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/AlwaysMale Female: http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/AlwaysFemale ^Applies to media, but media reflects society. Also, masculine = dominance, feminine = submission.

Your point is? The romance genre and individual romance plots are there for people who do care about them. Perhaps like a fantasy, people wish the stuff worked so well in real life. Or, maybe they just enjoy watching these plots unfold. If anything, the fact that relationships end badly so...

http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/DoubleStandard ^Read that for common ways each gender is portrayed in media. Also, look through the rest of the website, it basically talks about all forms of media in portrayal.