Search results

  1. A

    Why is "lay hold on eternal life" above and beyond "fight the good fight of faith" in 1Timothy 6:12?

    1Timothy 6:12 (paraphrased as under/above for effect) - Above: lay hold on eternal life, whereunto thou art also called - Under: Fight the good fight of faith Hint: Hebrews 7:26 - higher than the heavens = harmless (no fighting) - but plural heavens on high = division, war, fighting (eg...
  2. A

    Confess sin? Isn't this how ya get criminalized (not reconciled), and how devil (law) knows who it may DEVOUR?

    Seems both Catholics & Protestants have more to learn, if still promoting confess sin. Eg: Mark 3:29 notes law imputed sin hath never forgiveness. Eg: 2Corinthians 5:19 notes Christ does not impute sin to confess. Hint: pure religion = "undefiled", but vain religion = defiled = oops; And oops...
  3. A

    Hebrews 8: What are short falls still existing with a new and better covenant of plural God isn't yet one?

    Hint: - Better is not (yet) Best, nor (yet) true Rest (peace); So even when we're right of left/right, or better of good/better, we still need to leave (good/better)-->go on unto what's best, as previously noted in Hebrews 6's perfection (has no f-laws). - Better is still of plural God, not of...
  4. A

    Why does the word of God in Hebrews 4:12 first divide asunder soul<-->spirit, then also joints<-->marrow?

    Hint: 1Corinthians 15 soul<-->spirit is like Adam1<-->Adam2, and as in Adam all die, but in Christ all live, so then Christ is neither of Adam1 nor Adam2 because peril them vs peril us is peril both ways. Hint: Godly division is under/above: Genesis 1:7 soul<-->spirit is left/right division =...
  5. A

    Why does Romans 2 list four consequences for being contentious, no matter if left or right of contention?

    1 - indDIGnation: DIG up dirt on others also dirts you too 2 - wrath: "law worketh wrath" = OUCH, like a boomerang 3 - tribulation: "double" the trouble in Rev 18; if twice fallen 4 - anguish: a "millstone" necktie drowning would be better hmmm... four horses go forth in Revelation, which...
  6. A

    Dragon vs Michael: war: fighting: in heaven. Isn't this contention an err on both sides in Revelation 12?

    Hint: "Christ is our peace", not our war. But Jesus = division, not peace, is war. So Christ sitteth "above": hall of fame, where Jesus sat "down": hall of shame. Hint: War, what is it good for? Nothing! It's only friend to the 'under'-taker x2, so both 'under' law vs 'under' grace are err. For...
  7. A

    Is having partiality, thereby contention, thereby instability, err on both sides of atheists vs theists?

    Perhaps know is what makes you free of beliefs, since all sorts of people believe erroneous things. Perhaps correctly dividing is above of under/above, and not right of left/right as many suppose (believe), since be right to make others wrong is "inexcusable": for digging up dirt on others...
  8. A

    Ephesians 2:15. Which (singular) law of (plural and contrary) commandments did Christ abolish to be our peace?

    Hint: Genesis 2:16 -vs- 17 is plural & contrary commandments. - Genesis 2:16 = grace, freely = of God, and it's harmless by itself. - Genesis 2:17 = law, given by Moses, and harmageddon if added. So the woman is asked by the serpent: did God say Genesis 2:17.
  9. A

    Revelation 12? Dragon vs Michael: war: fighting in heaven. Isn't such contention an err on both sides?

    What sort of "heaven" has any sort of war? War: what is it good for? Absolutely nothing! Spiritual warfare is also spiritual wickedness. Perhaps it's describing childish law heaven, and earthly law -vs- law = loser -vs- loser, still trying to get peace by win a sides war, kinda like atheists...
  10. A

    Is the harmageddon in Revelation 16:16 for both of them -vs- them, if still having contention, not peace?

    Perhaps both them vs them should read Romans 2, to notice f-law judging is called "inexcusable" behaviour, and there are four consequences for being contentious: 1) indignation 2) wrath 3) tribulation 4) anguish Perhaps why four horses go forth in Revelation For in Mt 8:12 both children...
  11. A

    Why did Christ not receive any of the "mingled" drink (grace + law) offered him on the cross?

    References: Matthew 27:34 and Mark 15:23: Christ refused both such "mingled" drinks Would it be like in Genesis 2:16 + 17, where every tree + not every tree mingled = "surely die"? Would it be like in Genesis 6-8, where mingled clean + unclean = "flood of waters"? Would it be like in the...
  12. A

    Why did Christ refuse "mingled" drink offered?

    Hint: every tree + not every tree = oxy-moron Hint: grace + law = life + death = dead end Hint: blessed + cursed = accursed Hint: saved + destroyed = bad ending
  13. A

    Why is a better sacrifice, better resurrection, better hope of a better covenant still neither best nor rest?

    Hint: God will have mercy, and not sacrifice. Hint: resurrected Jesus still had a side effect. Hint We only hope for what we don't have. Hint: new covenant still has two houses and flawed minds, because it's still of plural God, not of God is one. So churches are told this: a mediator (Jesus)...
  14. A

    Do you believe God said both Genesis 2:16 + 17 if such are contrary things, if mingled is an oxymoron?

    Reference: Genesis 2: 16 + 17 2:16 = every tree, "freely" 2:17 = not every tree If "mingled" it's an oxy-moron: mix-two-are of contrary things. Reference: Genesis 3 Serpent asked: did "God" say Gen 2:17? Woman answered: God said Gen 2:16 + 17. Reference: Numbers 5:22 Woman says Amen, amen to...
  15. A

    Why is better sacrifice, better resurrection, better hope in a better covenant still neither best nor rest?

    Hint: 1Cor 13: People only Faith and Hope for what they do not yet have: Charity never fails. So 2/3 = 0.666 ... to infinity of "nothing" yet.
  16. A

    Hebrews 8:7-10 talks of a new covenant: but still two houses: house of Israel <--> house of Judah. Why?

    Hebrews 8:7-10 (KJV) For if that first [covenant] had been faultless, then should no place have been sought for the second. For finding fault with them, he saith, Behold, the days come, saith the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah: Not...
  17. A

    Do you think ''God'' said both Genesis 2: 16 + 17, if every tree + not every tree are contrary things mingled?

    and ''contrary'' things ''mingled'' make an oxy-moron, so when offered "mingled" drink, Christ refused it, lest he be an oxy-moron of a bi-polar God, the son of a Woman who'd say Amen, amen to blessed + cursed Genesis 1:6-8 God made a firmament to divide the waters above...
  18. A

    How does the script-u-are differ from plural & contrary scriptures they are when they mingle Gen 2:16 + 17?

    Reference: Galatians 4 notes the script-u-are saith "cast out the bondwoman and her son". Why does what they say, noted in 1Thessalonians 5:3, bring destruction upon them? Why do them get gathered unto Armageddon, witch is only available in "the Hebrew tongue", such as an unbridled tongue of...
  19. A

    What are four consequences of contention (law) in Romans 2?

    Do they have any allegoric relevance to four night mares in Revelation
Back
Top