Search results

First example: Yes. I'd feel horrible about it, and be burdened for life, but it's arithmatic. Better for the community to lose one, than lose 100s. Second example: Only if I knew beyond a shadow of a doubt they were destined to die, and only if I knew that they would go to heaven. Otherwise, no.

First example: Yes. I'd feel horrible about it, and be burdened for life, but it's arithmatic. Better for the community to lose one, than lose 100s. Second example: Only if I knew beyond a shadow of a doubt they were destined to die, and only if I knew that they would go to heaven. Otherwise, no.

First example: Yes. I'd feel horrible about it, and be burdened for life, but it's arithmatic. Better for the community to lose one, than lose 100s. Second example: Only if I knew beyond a shadow of a doubt they were destined to die, and only if I knew that they would go to heaven. Otherwise, no.

Depends on who they are, but I doubt it. Scripture can, however, make a good intro point or ending quote. You can still get a point across, without hinging an arguement on something some will just regard as false anyway.

so, none of you people mind the breaking of our constitution? Seeing as how many people can get away with "bending" it, should we really just change the rules entirely?